Subscription and demo access


 
About Interfax
Press Releases
Products & Services
Contact us
Customer Login
 


Headlines
 

08/22 19:36   U.S. pressure on Huawei forced China to start developing its own operating system - Medvedev
 
08/22 19:26   Polyus planning to place around 0.5% of shares in favor of subsidiary
 
08/22 19:23   Unipro may participate in selection of projects for modernization of energy infrastructure for 2025 with Surgutskaya GRES-2 units
 
08/22 19:23   Unregistered Moscow City Duma candidate Jankauskas detained when leaving detention facility
 
08/22 19:23   Medvedev, head of Tatarstan launch second primary-crude-distillation unit at Taneco
 
08/22 19:18   Ex-Berkut officer tried in Kyiv over Crimean events could be swapped for Ukrainian sailor - lawyer
 
08/22 19:17   Probe into case of Magomedov brothers completed - lawyer (Part 2)
 
08/22 19:14   Polyus board recommends dividends of 162.98 rubles/per share for H1 2019
 
08/22 19:13   Rosneft signs memorandum with state company in Mozambique on development of shelf deposits
 
08/22 19:11   Russian Eurobonds consolidate on Thursday amid lack of significant UST movement
 





 Subscription
You can access a demo version of, recieve more information about or subscribe to Interfax publications by filling in and sending the form below.

First name:


Last name:


Company:


Division:


E-mail:


Phone:


Country:


City:


Please enter the digits in the box below:

 

Interfax.com  |  Interviews  |  Trita Parsi: Trumps decision on Iranian nuclear deal is recipe for disaster



Interviews


October 17, 2017

Trita Parsi: Trumps decision on Iranian nuclear deal is recipe for disaster


President of the Washington-based National Iranian American Council Trita Parsi has given an interview to Interfax in which he speaks about the refusal of U.S. President Donald Trump to certify Irans compliance with the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Actions (JCPOA), as well as possible consequences of this Trumps move to the region, Europe and the whole world.

Question: Why has President Trump done that? Is there any rational reason behind his decision?

Answer: I dont see any national security reasons for him doing it. I see reasons that have more to do with his personal politics, his hatred for Obama, his desire to appease some of the big donors that are supporting his super PACs, and it is the Israelis and the Saudis. So, I dont see any no security justification for what he is doing, because what is he doing is really putting the United States at risk. This is a recipe for disaster, a self-destructive act that risking undoing years of careful diplomatic efforts.

Q.: Should one expect that his decision will deepen disagreements inside his administration? Some people disagree with him, notably U.S. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson and U.S. Secretary of Defense Jim Mattis. Should any resignation be expected?

A.: I think he will make their work more difficult. Whether they are willing to retire or not, its not quite clear, but their work is going to become much more difficult, because increasingly they are tying themselves in knots trying to defend the truly indefensible.

Q.: What might be Congress reaction?

A.: They are not happy about this, because they recognize that Trump is trying to push this issue onto them, so that they will be ones responsible for making the final decision to kill the deal, and that they will face the consequences of the ensuing disaster. But nevertheless we will see this week if the sentiments of Congress will change, because we have three thousand members of AIPAC coming to Capitol Hill this week to lobby, and one of the things they are going to lobby for is exactly this. So far, similar to the effort to destroy Obamacare, Trump has discovered that his fellow critics of the agreement have no real alternative. If Trump has succeeded at anything, it has been his ability to accidentally call the bluff of his colleagues on the Hill. On this issue of war and peace, cooler heads must prevail in Congress.

Q.: There is an opinion that through reinstating sanctions against Iran Trump is just trying to remove a competitor from the European natural gas and oil market. Could you comment on this?

A.: There may be economic calculations of that kind, but none of those frankly reached the point to be able to compete with security arguments that drove the previous administration towards striking this deal. These economic benefits are going to be minimal compared to the tremendous cost of another military war in the region.

Q.: Is it so serious?

A.: Certainly. The nuclear deal in the end of the day took two very negative scenarios off the table: the scenario of the Iranians having access to a bomb and the scenario of the United States going to war with Iran. Eliminating the deal puts these two very bad scenarios back onto the table. In Iran, the consequences are going to be that the hardline factions in Iran are going to benefit from this. They have already come out and said that this is gift to them. They are seeing how [Iranian President Hassan] Rouhani will be weakened internally as a result of this. Iran that starts to go back to a more hardline position obviously is going to have a significant impact on the rest of the region as well. And one thing I think is quite certain is that Iran is going to have a much tougher regional policy going forward as a result of this.

Q.: How this could influence Russias and Chinas role in the Gulf region?

A.: I think that from the Russian and Chinese scenario, on the one hand, perhaps not entirely unhappy to see the United States harm itself in the way that it is. But also it does create problems for them, because the United States that is this unserious, this reckless, and this untrustworthy, its going to create problems for Russia and China as well. And North Korea will be the next flashpoint in which China in particular will have significant difficulties. Any effort to unilaterally extort other countries of the P5+1 to renegotiate the deal and change the goalpost is a violation of the deal, by definition. It doesnt matter what fancy words are used to describe the process, in reality it is nothing short of the U.S. reneging on its word.

Q.: But what is about the European allies?

A.: The relationship between the United States and Europe are also going to suffer as a result of this. In the end of the day the Europeans view this as an important security achievement, and they do understand the disaster that will follow if it is killed. From Europes perspective the United States has extensively engaged in saying that they have undermined European interests, particularly when it comes to international agreements, it is walking out of the Paris Agreement, walking out of UNESCO and etc.

Q.: Those are political elements, and what about economy?

A.: There would be profound negative consequences too. They include alienating allies by targeting some of their foremost companies with secondary sanctions for their continued trade with Iran that was envisioned under the JCPOA and engaging in a trade war with our closest allies, who could retaliate against the U.S. economy or protect their own companies from U.S. sanctions.

Treasury Secretary Jacob Lew warned about this in 2016 when he said "if foreign jurisdictions and companies feel that we will deploy sanctions without sufficient justification or for inappropriate reasonssecondary sanctions in particularwe should not be surprised if they look for ways to avoid doing business in the United States or in U.S. dollars." India, South Korea, and Turkey are already implementing policies to use their own currency in transactions with Iran.



Interviews
 

.
Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov has given an interview to Interfax in which he speaks about the U.S. withdrawal from the Intermediate-range Nuclear Forces Treaty on that is expected on August 2, about Russia‘s response to the U.S. and NATO possible deployment of missiles banned by the treaty, and about whether the Cuban Missile Crisis may repeat itself.

more
.
.
German Foreign Minister Heiko Maas and Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov will hold negotiations on the sidelines of the Petersburg Dialogue forum in Germany on Thursday. Maas has given an interview to Interfax ahead of the forum, in which he speaks about prospects of settling the conflict in Ukraine, Germanys preparations for ensuring security in the absence of the INF Treaty and attempts to save the Iranian nuclear deal.

more
.
.
German Ambassador to Russia Rudiger von Fritsch, who is leaving Moscow after a five-year mission, told Interfax about the state of affairs in bilateral relations, Germanys position on the Nord Stream 2 project amidst sanction risks, and assessed prospects for settling the crisis in Ukraine under the new authorities in Kyiv.

more
.
.
U.S. Special Representative for Afghanistan Reconciliation Zalmay Khalilzad has given an interview to Interfax in which he speaks about results of the trilateral meeting on Afghanistan settlement that took place in Moscow on April 25, prospects of the intra-Afghan meeting in Doha, and Russia‘s role in the Afghan issue.

more
.
.
NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg has given an interview to Interfax ahead of the Alliances 70th anniversary that is to be celebrated on April 4. He speaks in the interview about the NATOs vision of future relations with Russia, its attitude to the situation surrounding the Intermediate-range Nuclear Forces Treaty (INF) Treaty and the New START Treaty, as well as further plans of expanding the Alliance.

more
.
.
British Ambassador to Russia Laurie Bristow has given an interview to Interfax in which he speaks about the current situation in the relationship between the United Kingdom and Russia, the impact of the Skripal case on it, the restoration of the numbers of diplomatic staff, exchange of information on counter-terrorism, possible introduction of sanctions over the Kerch Strait incident, the INF Treaty, and British-Russian economic relations.

more
.
.
Chairman of the German Committee on East European Economic Relations Wolfgang Büchele has given an interview to Interfax in which he speaks about the activity of German companies in Russia.

more

 
  
 ©   1991—2019   "Interfax News Agency" JSC. All rights reserved.
Contact information   |   Privacy Policy   |   Interfax offices   |   made by web.finmarket

News and other data on this site are provided for information purposes only, and are not intended for republication or redistribution. Republication or redistribution of Interfax content, including by framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Interfax.

Browse other Interfax sites:  Interfax.ru   |   IFX.RU   |   Interfax Group   Rambler's Top100