Subscription and demo access

About Interfax
Press Releases
Products & Services
Contact us
Customer Login


06/18 13:11   Russian State Duma passes bill suspending INF Treaty's implementation (Part 2)
06/18 13:08   Planned deployment of 1,000 U.S. troops to Middle East to have destabilizing consequences - Russian SVR chief
06/18 13:07   Russian State Duma passes bill suspending INF Treaty's implementation
06/18 13:07   U.S. pressuring Iran provocation of war - Ryabkov
06/18 13:07   Kremlin following situation on Chechnya-Dagestan border, but not stepping in - Peskov
06/18 13:00   MICEX and RTS Indexes at 13:00 MSK
06/18 12:57   No date yet for JCPOA Joint Commission meeting - Russian Deputy FM Ryabkov
06/18 12:57   Kremlin believes Zelensky's stance similar to Poroshenko's ideas
06/18 12:57   Putin, Trump might discuss cyberattacks if they meet in Osaka - Kremlin

You can access a demo version of, recieve more information about or subscribe to Interfax publications by filling in and sending the form below.

First name:

Last name:







Please enter the digits in the box below:  |  Interviews  |  Vladimir Chizhov: EU must take into account other countries specifics and...


February 23, 2011

Vladimir Chizhov: EU must take into account other countries specifics and parameters

Russian Ambassador to the European Union Vladimir Chizhov has given an interview to Interfax ahead of the visit by a governmental delegation led by Prime Minister Vladimir Putin to Brussels.

Question: Vladimir Alexeyevich, a number of experts estimate that the energy issue will be the most poignant part of the EU-Russia negotiating process over the future basic agreement, as the third EU energy package is due to become effective. Is there any chance of a compromise on this issue?

Anwser: Certainly, there is. This has to be dealt with. This has to addressed. If you let everything drift away, there will be problems. Our energy companies, and not just Gazprom but others too, will have problems. There will be problems on the EU side as well. I can give you a specific example. Lithuania, an EU member, acting in the best traditions of revolutionary radicalism, is essentially heading towards the nationalization of its energy infrastructure. that is to say the gas pipeline owned by a consortium of Gazprom and a European company. They are expected to be left with just distribution networks. They say you cant have both. Actually, this breaking down itself is quite debatable.

All this has to be addressed, and this is not just the energy sector. In principle, this is a reflection of a broader approach, in which I see a long-term problem both in our relations with the European Union and its relations with other countries. I am talking here not only to EU officials but to their other partners as well: Americans, the Chinese, Indians, the Japanese, the Norwegians, the Swiss and so on. The problem is that the European Union, apart from its conviction that everything it produces in this world represents the best global standard, also shows a persistent tendency to apply this standard to the rest of the world.

For instance, civil aircraft exhaust emissions. Carbon dioxide emissions in excess of the EU quotas will have to be acquired by airline companies for money. Well, this probably could be discussed in the context of global efforts to fight global warming, but not unilaterally. If the situation does not change, Russia will have to retaliate. Then the fees for Trans-Siberian flights of European aircraft will appear only half of the problem. Because then it will be a question of billions of euros for flights over the Russian airspace.

Or take another standard, wood packaging, which is due to become effective in the future. Any wooden object, including a wooden box, a crate, must have a certificate of conformity to ecological standards valid for two weeks. It might do for Europe. But if you pack something in a wooden box in Krasnoyarsk and send it to Germany, for example. It will take more than two weeks for this box just to reach the Russian border.

The specifics and parameters of other states must be taken into account. And there is work to be done on all that.

Q.: Recently the European Union has repeatedly voiced grievances over air transportation agreements signed between a number of EU member states and Russia.

A.: Most EU countries already have this problem. The majority of European Union member states were formally warned by the European Commission that unless they change bilateral agreements with third countries, not only with Russia, they will be sued at the European court. The European Commission would sometimes sue its member states. Sometimes it would win, sometimes it would lose.

In this particular case it is a problem of renouncing the notion of "national carrier" and switching to the notion of an "EU carrier." We agree to discuss this matter. But it should be a subject of negotiations and not unilateral decisions. These talks must be held with the member states and the European Commission under a unified European template. Russian Transport Minister Igor Levitin, who is coming to Brussels as part of the Russian governmental delegation, is due to meet with his partner Siim Kallas, member of the European Transport Commission, on Wednesday evening. Their agenda includes precisely these problems.

Q.: There is also a foreign policy division in these consultations between the EU and Russian executive authorities. Has there been any progress in efforts to set up a foreign policy and security committee?

A.: I think the upcoming meeting between Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Viktorovich Lavrov and EU High Representative on Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Catherine Ashton as part of the visit by the Russian governmental delegation will facilitate progress in this matter.

Q.: Observers from the EU mission in Georgia are demanding access to Abkhazia and South Ossetia.

A.: This is a matter for Abkhazians and South Ossetians, who have not been asked.

Q.: And how do you assess the work of the EU mission in Kosovo?

A.: This is not an easy question. First of all, the functions of this mission are not outlined quite clearly. Objectively, of course, this mission representing the whole European Union, in which five of the 27 members have not recognized Kosovo, has a limited space for maneuvering. Besides, we believe that attempts to oust the UN mission are counterproductive. Under the UN Security Council resolution N 1244 of 1999 that no one has repealed, Kosovo remains under the United Nations jurisdiction. The fact that today Kosovo is recognized by about 70 countries does not change the matter. They are still a minority within the international community. They are one third of UN members. As regards the efficiency of this mission, there are various points of view. The Serbian authorities have grievances against it and reprimands for a unilateral approach. There are problems with this mission.

Q.: What can you tell about EU sanctions against Belarus?

A.: From the point of view of international law, they are not sanctions. By international law, sanctions can only be imposed by the UN Security Council. Sanctions were imposed against Iran, but restrictive measures were adopted with regard to Belarus. This is counterproductive, in principle. Any measures aimed at isolating a state, be it Belarus or any other country, are counterproductive, and certainly we do not support them. No, we do not like everything that is going on in Belarus either. And we are saying it openly, including in straightforward conversations with our Belarusian colleagues and friends. But restrictive measures are not the right path to follow.

Q.: European partners of the Russian governmental delegation as set to raise the issue about the second trial against Mikhail Khodorkovsky and Platon Lebedev, as well as the lawyer Sergei Magnitsky case, as part of the legal agenda.

A.: I think these issues will be outlined, though not as urgent matters. I was asked before about the European Parliament resolution on Russia. The European Parliament is making very many resolutions. None of them is legally binding for enforcement structures. While the Lisbon Treaty has strengthened the competence of the European Parliament, their own ideas about their own competence have increased in a geometric progression.


U.S. Special Representative for Afghanistan Reconciliation Zalmay Khalilzad has given an interview to Interfax in which he speaks about results of the trilateral meeting on Afghanistan settlement that took place in Moscow on April 25, prospects of the intra-Afghan meeting in Doha, and Russia‘s role in the Afghan issue.

NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg has given an interview to Interfax ahead of the Alliances 70th anniversary that is to be celebrated on April 4. He speaks in the interview about the NATOs vision of future relations with Russia, its attitude to the situation surrounding the Intermediate-range Nuclear Forces Treaty (INF) Treaty and the New START Treaty, as well as further plans of expanding the Alliance.

British Ambassador to Russia Laurie Bristow has given an interview to Interfax in which he speaks about the current situation in the relationship between the United Kingdom and Russia, the impact of the Skripal case on it, the restoration of the numbers of diplomatic staff, exchange of information on counter-terrorism, possible introduction of sanctions over the Kerch Strait incident, the INF Treaty, and British-Russian economic relations.

Chairman of the German Committee on East European Economic Relations Wolfgang Büchele has given an interview to Interfax in which he speaks about the activity of German companies in Russia.

German Foreign Minister Heiko Maas has given an interview to Interfax ahead of his visit to Moscow in which he speaks about Germany‘s position on the INF Treaty and the Ukrainian settlement.

Russian lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya has given an interview to Interfax in which she speaks about the charges brought against her in the United States.

Qatari Ambassador to Russia Fahad bin Mohamed Al-Attiyah has given an interview to Interfax in which he speaks about the consequences of sanctions against Qatar, the normalization of relations between Qatar and Saudi Arabia, the Syrian crisis, and gas relations with Russia.


 ©   1991—2019   "Interfax News Agency" JSC. All rights reserved.
Contact information   |   Privacy Policy   |   Interfax offices   |   made by web.finmarket

News and other data on this site are provided for information purposes only, and are not intended for republication or redistribution. Republication or redistribution of Interfax content, including by framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Interfax.

Browse other Interfax sites:   |   IFX.RU   |   Interfax Group   Rambler's Top100